“For the Remission of Sins”: Ancient Writings on the Efficacy of Baptism

Water baptism is the most ancient rite in Christianity, and the New Testament is replete with examples of baptism by immersion from John’s baptism of repentance in the River Jordan to the proselytes of the Apostles to the epistlary metaphors of baptism as burial with Christ (Rom. 6:4) and Noah’s ark (I Pt. 3.20-21). While most Christian denominations observe some ordinance of baptism, the majority of Protestants reduce the act to a mere public profession of faith, decrying the doctrine of remission of sins in baptism as “salvation by works” rather than “salvation by grace.” In fact, neither biblical exegesis nor history divides baptism from salvation. Patristical writings, which are non-canonical, post-Apostolic epistles and apologetics, provide ample evidence that early Christians universally accepted water baptism as the sole mode for remitting sins.

St. Clement, purportedly the same Clement named by Paul in Philippians, asks in a letter to the Corinthians: ” . . . shall we, if we keep not our baptism pure and undefiled, come into the kingdom of God?” (Hoole 57). Clearly, Clement identifies Christian baptism as the moment of cleansing. St. Barnabas examines foreshadowing of baptism and the cross in the Old Testament: “Concerning the water, it is written with respect to Israel, how that they will not receive the baptism that bringeth remission of sins, but will establish one for themselves” (Hoole 86). Further, he writes: “Learn ye: having received the remission of our sins, and having hoped upon the name of the Lord, we have become new, having been again created entirely” (Hoole 97). These passages explicitly connect the erasure of sins with water baptism, and Barnabas explains that this accompanies hoping on the Name of the Lord, the most primitive apostolic baptismal formula.

The Shepherd of Hermas, a 2nd century apocalyptic work, supports both the notion of baptism by immersion and for spiritual cleansing: ” . . . we went down into the water and obtained remission of our former sins” (Lightfoot 425). Hermas, like Barnabas, refers to invocation of the Name of Jesus in the rite: “‘For before a man,’ saith he, ‘has borne the name of [the Son of] God, he is dead; but when he has received the seal, he layeth aside his deadness, and resumeth life. The seal then is the water: so they go down into the water dead, and they come up alive” (Lightfoot 472). Baptism in the Name of Jesus is, in Hermas, regenerative.

Justin Martyr expanded the biblical baptismal formula to “in the name of God, the Father and Lord of the universe, and of our Saviour Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit”, but he retained the Apostolic teaching of baptism for the remission of sins: “[We] may obtain in the water the remission of sins formerly committed, And this washing is called illumination, because they who learn these things are illuminated in their understandings” (Roberts and Donaldson 60).

While the New Testament doctrine of water baptism by immersion solely in the Name of Christ degenerated with the increasing schisms and encroaching apostasy of the early Church, the nascent Catholic communion retained the biblical connection between baptism and the remission of sins. The Roman Creed, which dates from the 3rd century, includes a generic belief in the “remission of sins”, and the 4th century Nicene Creed says: “I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins.” Though most Protestants eschew the idea of spiritual regeneration in the baptismal ceremony, the scriptural view espoused by modern Oneness Pentecostals is greatly supported both by the primary text of God’s Word and the most ancient bishops and apologists for the Christian faith. Baptism is an indisputable element of the New Birth; and by faith in the redemptive work of the blood of Jesus Christ, our sins are truly washed away in the fountain of His forgiveness.


Hoole, Charles H., trans. The Apostolic Fathers, the Epistles of S. Clement, S. Ignatius, S. Barnabas, S. Polycarp together with the Martyrdom of S. Ignatius and S. Polycarp. London: Irvingtons, 1872.

Lightfoot, Joseph Barber, trans. The Apostolic Fathers. London: Macmillan and Co., 1898.

Roberts, Alexander Rev. and James Donaldson, trans. Translations of the Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325. Edinburgh: L & T Clark, 1867.


4 Responses to ““For the Remission of Sins”: Ancient Writings on the Efficacy of Baptism”

  1. Darren LaRose Says:

    1 Jn.5:6 ….not by water only, but by water and blood. He.9:22 …. without the shedding of blood is no remission.

    Baptisim without the blood is like burial without death. When were the children of Isreal passed over? It was back in Egypt. They wondered around in the desert because they forgot their relationship to the blood.

    Both Bro. Ralph Renolds and Bro. Witherspoon preached that in Acts 2:38 repentence and remission of sins are connected. Bro. Witherspoon said that baptisim without repentence and remission of sins is like “Baptisim with out Dealth.” The water in baptisim does not have any cleansing power. It is just water. The blood of Christ has the power to wash away our sins. What was Ananias really saying to Paul? Did Paul repent for the remission of sins? Ananias was immplying that he do so. Our Lord Jesus Christ vindicated John the Baptists ministry of ” Repentence for the Remission of Sins” when he died on the cross and shed his blood. Jesus said, “It is finsished.”

    Brother Witherspoon said we die first then we are buried. Paul said the same thing. In the like manner we are buried with Christ in baptisim.

    Is baptism (burial) necessary for salvation? You better believe it. Jesus said, ” Water and Spirit to enter the Kingdom of Heaven.” Water, Blood, and Spirit are necessary elements in salvation. But please do not forget about the blood. We must never forget our relationship to the blood of the Lamb. Bro. Ralph Renolds said that it is the Blood of the Lamb that insures that our names will be writen in the Lambs book of Life.

    Not by water only!! The blood of the Lamb for remission and water for burial and resurection into newness of life.

    Bro. Darren LaRose

  2. martha Says:

    What are you thoughts on Eph.4:5 One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism? What Baptism? The baptism of the Holy Ghost or the Baptism, in water, in the name of Jesus Christ. I see this scripture as being baptism in water in Jesus’ Name with the promise of the Holy Ghost to Come as being one baptism.

    • mcshaw2 Says:

      I believe that the Scripture is referring to the baptism of salvation, which would include both baptism in the Name of Jesus Christ and Spirit baptism.

  3. bfields Says:

    I must admit, I don’t understand the confusion with the salvation message the Bible teaches. The apostles told converts to “believe” and to be “baptised in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of their sins”. It’s that simple. To read into this further, is pointless. As for Paul, and his conversion found in Acts, just ACCEPT the text. “And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord”. That’s pretty simple. It couldn’t be more plain. What’s the definition of the word “is”?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: